The Regulars

I walk the same loop around the same lake most mornings. It is about seven miles, and over a year you get to know the path better than you meant to. You also get to know the people on it. Not their names, mostly. Their stride, their dog, their greeting.

Most of them come and go. Some mornings the lot is full, some mornings it is two cars and a lot of geese. But there is a handful, five or ten people, who are there every time. Cold or warm, busy week or slow week, Monday or Wednesday.

There is a man in his sixties whose every piece of cycling gear is fluorescent yellow, and who gives me a full wave every time he loops past. A runner in a weighted vest, eyes on the path, who gives a simple nod: she sees me, and she lets me know it. A woman on a recumbent bike, low to the ground and the happiest person on the trail, with a wave over her head and a cheerful good morning. An older couple with a goldendoodle, who never go far and are always there. And a high school kid, shirtless whenever it is warm enough, cap on backwards, who gives me a nod and a "sup" and is gone in about four seconds. Every single day.

Some of them are fast and some of them are not. A couple are in better shape than I will ever be. That is not what makes them regulars. They are the ones who keep showing up, and this week's video is about the question they ask without meaning to: what are you a regular at?

Why the middle of the week is the hard part

The honest answer, for most of us, is that we are regulars on Monday. We covered the reason on this channel in June. Hengchen Dai, Katherine Milkman and Jason Riis found that a new week alone raised the probability of a gym visit by about a third among nearly twelve thousand university members. Motivation loves a clean line on the calendar.

The line fades. By Wednesday the week is not new, the fresh start has spent itself, and what is left is whatever you have actually built. That is where the regulars are different, and it is worth being precise about how. They do not wait for motivation. Somewhere along the way, showing up stopped being a decision they make every morning and became a description of who they are.

One place, and one miss does not break it

In 2010 Phillippa Lally and her colleagues at University College London published one of the few studies that watched a habit form from the beginning. Ninety six volunteers each chose one new behaviour, something like eating a piece of fruit with lunch or running for fifteen minutes after dinner, and agreed to do it every day in the same context for twelve weeks. Each day they reported whether they had done it and how automatic it felt.

Two findings matter for the regulars. The first is how long it took. The typical participant reached the plateau of automaticity after about 66 days, but the range ran from 18 days to 254. There is no magic number, and the 21 day claim you have heard is not in this paper or any other. The second finding is the one I want you to take with you. In the authors' words, missing one opportunity to perform the behaviour "did not materially affect the habit formation process." One miss did not reset the count. What mattered was the overall pattern of repetition.

Notice the design of the study, too. Everyone chose a single context: the same time, the same place, the same cue. That is not incidental. In 2002 Wendy Wood, Jeffrey Quinn and Deborah Kashy had college students keep hourly diaries of what they were doing. Between a third and a half of everything they recorded, 43 percent in the larger study, was something they did just about every day in the same place. And while they were doing those things, they were mostly thinking about something else. The regulars have a lake and a loop. The place does the deciding, so they do not have to.

Why the important things lose when the week is loud

If habit explains how the regulars keep going, a second study explains why the rest of us stop. In 2018 Meng Zhu, Yang Yang and Christopher Hsee published five experiments in the Journal of Consumer Research on what they called the mere urgency effect. Participants were offered a choice between tasks. One carried a short deadline and paid less. The other had more time and paid more. Even with the payoffs shown plainly, people kept choosing the urgent task.

Two details from the paper apply directly to a Best Year Yet plan. The effect was stronger for people who thought of themselves as busy. And it shrank when the payoffs were made salient at the moment of choice, when people were reminded what each task was actually worth. Busyness pulls attention toward the clock. A reminder of the payoff pulls it back toward the outcome.

Best Year Yet has had a name for the important but not urgent category for a long time. We call it Gold Time, because it pays off at least ten to one against anything else you could do with the hour, and because it is the first thing that gets pushed aside. Nothing about a walk at six in the morning is urgent. Nobody calls if you skip it. Which is exactly why it needs a regular, and why the weekly look at your plan matters more than it feels like it should. It is the payoff reminder the urgency study says works.

Never miss twice

The regulars miss days. I miss days. Weather, travel, a bad night's sleep, a week on the road. The difference is that they do not miss two in a row. James Clear put the rule in three words in Atomic Habits: never miss twice. Missing once is an accident. Missing twice is the start of a new habit, and it is not the one you wanted. Lally's data gives the rule its footing. One miss costs you almost nothing. A pattern of misses is a different pattern.

You do not close the gap between where you are and where you want to be in one big leap. I know something about that. Not long ago my knees would not let me walk at all, and I could barely manage a flight of stairs. Nobody finishes a seven mile loop in a single step. It closes one ordinary lap, or one ordinary step, at a time, most of them on days nobody noticed.

It spreads

One more finding, because it surprised me. In 2017 Sinan Aral and Christos Nicolaides studied about 1.1 million runners over five years, using the weather as a natural experiment: rain in one friend's city changes how far that friend runs without changing how far you run, which lets you see influence cleanly. Exercise turned out to be socially contagious. On the same day, an extra kilometre run by your friends meant about 0.3 of a kilometre more for you. And the influence ran mostly from the less active toward the more active, not the other way around.

That matches what I see. Right now a few friends are posting their weight loss online, and it has been a burr under my blanket. If you have ever ridden, you know it is the saddle blanket that touches the horse, so that is where a burr makes itself felt. The regulars in my life are not only closing their own gap. On the cold mornings they are closing mine. I get out of the house partly because I know who will be out there, waiting on that greeting.

This week

Pull out your Best Year Yet plan and look at your Top Ten Goals. Most of them are Gold Time: health, relationships, growth. None of them will be urgent on a Wednesday. Ask one question of each. Is this a goal I am a regular at, or a goal I have good intentions about?

Pick the one that only gets intentions. Give it a place and a time, the way the regulars have a lake and a loop. Show up there this week, even in a small way, and again next week. If you miss, do not miss twice.

I am doing the same. For me it is music. It needs a consistent place in my week, and the people who will help me close that gap.

Who you are on a Wednesday determines how much you enjoy your Saturday. Celebrate where you are a regular today, and be honest about where you are not. Then close the gap.

A note on the evidence

Lally's sample was 96 volunteers, 82 of whom provided enough data, predominantly postgraduate students, self-reporting one behaviour each, and the 66 day median is computed on the 39 participants whose data fit the habit curve well enough to model. It is a small study and an honest one, and it is the source of nearly every "how long does a habit take" figure you have read. Wood, Quinn and Kashy's diaries came from undergraduates, and the authors call their estimate a lower bound, since students' days hold more study and novelty than most. Zhu, Yang and Hsee's experiments were laboratory and online tasks with modest payoffs, not real world planning, so the mere urgency effect is a demonstrated tendency rather than a measured rate. Aral and Nicolaides studied runners on one fitness platform, so the contagion finding is about people who already track their exercise. The Goethe line quoted in the video and on the Gold Time principle, "things which matter most must never be at the mercy of things which matter least," is traditionally attributed to him and is not traced to a specific work.

← Back to all articles